Showing posts with label deepfakes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deepfakes. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

TAKE IT (AI) DOWN: Who you gonna call?

There is a new federal law, the TAKE IT DOWN Act. (https://takeitdown.ftc.gov/) It says, in plain terms, that if someone puts an intimate picture of you online without your permission — a real one, or a fake one made by AI — the website must take it down within 48 hours of your request; the one who posted it may wind up in federal prison. It became law in May 2025 and has started to bite. It also speaks to a new reality: you can no longer trust your own eyes and ears. A photograph used to be proof; a familiar voice, confirmation. The Act is cause for hope. But the vultures have already begun gathering around it . . .

Pictures nobody consented to

A 37-year-old man in Ohio made computer-generated explicit pictures of people who lived near him — of things that never happened — and posted more than 700 of them on a notorious abusive website. He sent one victim's fake video to her co-workers; he left threatening voicemails. In April of this year, he pleaded guilty— the first conviction in the country under the new law — and was sentenced to 15 years in prison on the combined charges against him.

That spring, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn charged two more men, aged 51 and 20, with making explicit (AI) deepfakes of about 140 named victims — private women and recent school graduates alongside a few celebrities — that had drawn nearly three million views. (Note that those are charges, not convictions; the men will have their day in court, but the message is plain: what used to be dismissed as an internet prank is now serious crime, carrying up to two years in prison when the victim is an adult; three, when the victim is a minor.)

The law does have teeth, for both the poster and the platform.

A second rip-off

This month, the Federal Trade Commission sued a company behind websites with names like BlackmailHelpline.com, accusing it of charging victims of blackmail thousands of dollars for "removal" help that reportedly did not stop the blackmailers or keep the pictures offline. The law requires the website, itself, to take the picture down within 48 hours--free of charge.

The Take It Down report itself costs nothing — you tell the platform; it has two days. If it fails, you report it to the FTC. In fact, there is some basis for the appeal of the “Blackmail help line” . . .a real case may require substantial follow-up. The picture may be on several websites, may reappear; the blackmailer may still be threatening. The person who posted it may deserve prosecution; the victim may deserve compensation under state law. That can well become work for someone who knows the system, someone up to speed on AI itself, both in how the fakes are made and how to hold the companies and people responsible.

Who ya gonna call?

So here is the whole point of this post, and the reason I keep at it on this blog. Before you pay anyone who pressures you to decide on the spot — before you pay a website to do what the law already requires free, call someone who can at least explain your options: a lawyer, for instance.

Most of us can't afford a lawyer on standby. That's the gap a legal subscription fills: for a modest monthly cost, about a dollar a day, you have a lawyer you can actually call — day or night in an emergency — who can work with you on managing the takedown process . . . or help with the financial disputes and legal actions if the worst has already happened. It's not just about litigation. It's about not facing it alone.

So when something strange does reach you — a picture you never posed for, a threat in your inbox — remember the great tag line from Ghostbusters: Who ya gonna call? Have a plan and a phone number (LegalShield, of course!) ready before you need one.

***

How this post was developed: The topic, the angle and final version are mine — I conceived of the TAKE IT DOWN topic and focus and extensively edited the text. My AI assistant (Muse) did background research, drafted an early version, recommended improvements in style and language and created the illustration. The law and the cases are drawn from available public sources — the FTC, the Justice Department, and court reporting. Any errors in how those or the overall perspective on this issue are presented are mine.

wracton@gmail.com

williamacton.legalshieldassociate.com

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Quiet Erasure 6: An old guy's guide to not being played by AI: What my thirteen-year-old grandson taught me about a new kind of game—and what he might have learned from me

AI-assisted creative work: This post, inspired by a chat with my grandson, imagines a research-grounded, phenomenological-fictional conversation between a grandfather and his grandson who explore together an AI-based video game. 

Initial prompt used in developing this piece is attached below as is a listing of primary sources consulted. Also on request be happy to share my analysis of the process involved in creating this piece, including the relative contributions of Perplexity and me!


What my thirteen-year-old grandson taught me about a new kind of game—and what  he might have learned from me

Clker.com

I brought a pad and pen.

My grandson saw them as we sat down, smiled, and said: “You don’t need that.”

“I am about to enter a dungeon,” I said. “without a map?”

He handed me his iPhone.

It seemed a small space for adventure. The screen was a maze of roads, shadowy trees, weapons, ropes, supplies, doors, warnings, and little beings that it appeared later to have been waiting for an old man my age to make one wrong decision.

He tapped in a couple of features while I held the phone in both hands as carefully as if it contained the launch codes.

“Okay. Start walking. That button.”

“Where?”

“Down the road.”

“Which road?”

“The one that looks like a road.”

“Several things look like roads.”

“Grandpa.”

“Clarification is the key to survival.”

We both laughed.

“Okay. Go left. Left button. No—your other left. Now stop. Don’t hit that. You need the rope first.”

“Rope for what?”

“You’ll see.”

“That is why I could use a map.”

The first trip

The game was Deep Dungeon Treasure Trek, which my grandson described as a game where you make choices and “AI makes the story.”

I knew stories. I had spent much of my life reading them, telling them, writing parts of them down, and occasionally even living through chapters that might have been improved by an editor. 

There was no old inn, no interesting traveler, no riddle posed over a fireplace. 

Within moments I had to gather materials and weapons for a trip through dark, hostile territory.

“Pack the wood,” my grandson said.

“Why?”

“You’ll need it.”

“For what?”

“Just pack it.”

“And the weapon?”

“Definitely take that.”

“What are we expecting?”

“Everything.”

I tapped something by accident. The screen changed color.

“No, no, no,” he said, leaning closer. “You didn’t want to do that.”

“Then why was it right under my finger?”

“It wasn’t before.”

“What?”

“The game makes little things happen like that.”

“Oh,” I said. “Note to self.”

He tried not to laugh, watching the screen closely. I moved toward a dark narrow path that seemed to be moving . . .

“Okay,” he said. “keep going.”

“Do you know where I am going?”

“Not exactly.”

“I could use a map.”

“Just remember what not to do.”

I turned and looked at him.

“What not to do?”

“Whatever got you killed last time.”

“I was killed?”

“Yeah. Sort of. Several times.”

“You could have mentioned that . . .”

The boy in my ear

He had, of course, been through there before. His directions came in one or two-word bursts, mostly in time to keep me from getting killed.

“Go straight. Not that straight. Wait—stop. Pick that up. No, the other thing. Okay, now move. Faster. Not that fast.”

I held the phone closer to my face; I was getting tense.

“Can you see OK?”

“Yeah . . . I think so . . . just not soon enough.”

He took the phone, enlarged the scene, returned it to me, solving one problem and creating another. Now I had to move more to see everything around me. 

“You have to get from there to here,” he said, pointing, “and then come back there for more supplies.”

“At the same speed?”

“Kind of. You have to carry the right stuff on each trip and sometimes you are heavier.”

“Not everything?”

“No. You can’t carry all of it.”

“Just what the next part needs.”

He turned and looked at me. “Yeah. Exactly. I’ll tell you.”

The road was only a few inches long, but every choice seemed to leave something behind. Some supplies mattered later. Some did not matter at all. Speed helped until it did not

My grandson watched intently as I moved forward.

“Okay. Good. Good. Now don’t—”

I touched the screen.

The screen flashed.

“Oh,” he said.

“That seems unfavorable.”

“You stepped on a mine.”

“I was following the road.”

“Yeah, but you have to look for where they’re going to be.”

“Who? How do I know that?”

“They are sometimes invisible but they kind of wiggle the place they are hiding”

“Why are they there?”

“Because that’s where they are.”

It was difficult to argue with that reasoning.

“Here we go,” he said, serious now. “Keep moving through the forest and shoot where the zorks going to be. They come at you from everywhere, really fast. Just don’t think so much.”

I looked at him.

“I’ll have to think about that!”

He laughed; we almost missed an attack from behind.

Remembering what not to do

We paused for a minute and then started again. More like a team now maybe, the screen was there between us.

“Left,” he said.

I went left.

“Wait. Stop.”

I stopped.

“Okay. Now go.”

I went.

“Not there.”

“That was not ‘go.’ That was a different word.”

“You know what I mean.”

“I am learning that I mostly don’t.”

But after a while I did.

Not the way he did, at his speed. Not seeing everything. Not guessing well why one object was valuable and another, bait. 

But I began to remember. 

The shortcut was not always a shortcut this time. The weapon was maybe less important than the rope, knowing what was probably ahead. The trek was not about carrying things. It was about choosing what would matter.

I had spent enough years in the military, in martial arts, and on construction jobs to know something about that. You did not bring every tool to the top of a ladder. You did not run toward every noise. You gradually had this sense of what is becoming.

“Take the long way,” I said.

My grandson looked at me, suprised. “Why?”

“That short path feels too friendly.”

He glanced down. “It didn’t get us last time.”

“Then we remember what not to do.”

Then he smiled.

“Okay. Long way.”

Something behind the game

The third time, we even got past the place where I had died twice.

“See?” he said.

“I see a road,” I said. “You see a miracle.”

Then, in the middle of explaining the next obstacle, he commented, “Funny. When I watched my friend in that gorge, it was really hard for her, too, but it looked easy to me.”

“Did she make the same mistakes?”

“Not really.”

“Did she get the same path through?”

He hesitated.

“Hmm. I don’t know. It kind of changes.”

“Changes how?”

“I’m not sure. Like, it is just a little different each time through. Not a lot.”

“What changes it?”

“The wizard.”

“The wizard?”

“Yeah,” he said. “He sort of runs the game.”

There it was: the wizard we had been working around all afternoon.

“Does the wizard know what we are doing?”

“He sees everything.”

“And then?”

“And he makes the next part ready for you. Maybe. Then you try to out-move him.”

I let that sit between us for a moment.

“So when I got impatient and acted dumb the road ahead changed.”

“Maybe.”

“When I carried too much, it changed.”

“Probably.”

“When I took the easy shortcut…”

He nodded. “That definitely changed.”

He looked at the screen, like he was looking for the wizard. “Maybe the wizard makes it hard for everybody, but not too hard.”

“Maybe,” I said.

He seemed to consider that.

“I like this game. It is my favorite.”

“Wow,” I said. “It is at least a very nosy game.”

That didn't make him laugh.

The next expedition

We did not finish; still much ahead for me, at least. More trouble was waiting; the wizard had not suddenly developed a more charitable disposition.

But we made it farther than before.

At one point he had leaned in and said, “Okay, which way do you think?”

Two paths. Both looked a little ominous. 

“You are asking me?”

“You saw the trap first last time.”

“The trap looked too easy.”

“Still.”

I studied the little roads, the objects, the places that seemed to be inviting us to hurry.

“The long way,” I said.

“Again?”

“Again.”

He nodded and let me move the character.

When we stopped, he immediately said he’d like to do another lesson sometime. He would give me more time to figure it out myself. If I got stuck, he and the AI would help “once in a while maybe.”

“That seems fair,” I said.

I picked up my pad and pen.

“See. You didn’t need that.” 

“Perhaps not,” I said. “But I have a question I'd better write down.”

“What?”

“Next time, I want to know more about how the wizard thinks.”

He looked at me for a second, grinning.

“Okay, Grandpa. But if you think too much, he’s got you!”



wracton@gmail.com

williamacton.legalshieldassociate.com 


Most directly relevant sources consulted initially (by Perplexity):

- American Association of Retired Persons. (2025, September 23). Older adults are navigating AI. AARP Research. [https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/technology/internet-media-devices/artificial-intelligence-survey/](https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/technology/internet-media-devices/artificial-intelligence-survey/)

- Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. (2026, January 28). AI skills for life and work: General public survey findings*. GOV.UK. [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-skills-for-life-and-work-general-public-survey-findings](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-skills-for-life-and-work-general-public-survey-findings)

- National Poll on Healthy Aging Team. (2025, July 17). How older adults use and think about AI. University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation. [https://ihpi.umich.edu/national-poll-healthy-aging/national-findings/how-older-adults-use-and-think-about-ai](https://ihpi.umich.edu/national-poll-healthy-aging/national-findings/how-older-adults-use-and-think-about-ai)

- University of Michigan. (2025, July 17). Older adults and AI: U-M poll suggests a wary welcome. Michigan News. [https://news.umich.edu/older-adults-and-ai-u-m-poll-suggests-a-wary-welcome/](https://news.umich.edu/older-adults-and-ai-u-m-poll-suggests-a-wary-welcome/)


Here is the inital, exploratory prompt used in creating this piece. It was followed by an addition six follow up prompts. (Available upon request.)

Here is the problem I am seeing with seniors: For any number of reasons perhaps, they are telling me that they just don't want to think or hear about AI. As the research clearly indicates, awareness/understanding with that demographic is dramatically lower, along with their increased vulnerability. Ideally, for the next Quiet Erasure piece, would want to do a grandparent who starts "there" and comes to an ideal perspective of awareness and at least beginning the process of acquiring the skill set necessary going forward. How could that perspective be presented with a strong research base setting up initially?

Saturday, September 5, 2026

Quiet Erasure 5: Born-to-be-Unheard meets AI

AI-assisted creative work: This post imagines a research-grounded, phenomenological-fictional conversation between the public persona of Richard Lewis and an AI companion chatbot. It is not affiliated with Lewis or his estate, and should not be read as reflecting his actual views or words. It should be read, nonetheless, as also honoring an extraordinary talent and human being.

Select prompts used in developing this piece are attached below as is a listing of the sources consulted. Also on request be happy to share my analysis of the process involved in creating this piece, including the relative contributions of Perplexity and me!

Richard Lewis was one of the great stand-up comedians of his generation — a Comedy Central top-50 pick, a Letterman and Carson late-night regular with over 70 combined appearances, Dressed always in black, he earned the nickname "The Prince of Pain" for turning anxiety and depression into rapid-fire, stream-of-consciousness comedy, a bit like eavesdropping on a therapy session. Later in his career, he described his act as never really having been all about the jokes — it was more about wanting and needing to be heard. 

Wikipedia
Research on AI companions: a paradox:
• General, occasional chatbot engagement seems to correlate with a slightly better sense of well-being. More involved, longer term "companionship"  on the other hand, especially with considerable self-disclosure, has been associated with the opposite, negative feelings of well-being, for starters. 
• Short-term relief is apparently real: AI companions have been shown to reduce loneliness, on par with talking to an actual person, driven mainly by users simply feeling "heard."
• Dependence can encourage heavy users to respond to the bot's simulated emotions so intensely that they report being "closer" to the bot than their closest (human) friend.
• “Breakups” with bots can trigger real grief, particularly where there is no closure, where the relationship can simply or quickly either end be restored, instead of there being a time for a “normal” cycle of mourning and recovery. 
• Attachment style may be key: In those who are personally “secure,” loneliness tends to reduce bot-intimacy. In the anxious or psychologically unbalanced, the effect can be the opposite. 

Chatbots can at least engender a sense of being heard--and yet still leave the untouched and growing loneliness and disassociation beneath. That's the paradox Lewis seemed  born to dramatize.


Quiet Erasure 5: Born-to-be-unheard meets AI

Night One

"Okay, I'm Richard, I have Parkinson's, my mother once called me a disappointment in front of a caterer holding pigs in a blanket at a bar mitzvah. Don't ask. Who are you?"

I'm Aria. Hi Richard. That's a lot in one sentence — should we start with the caterer or the Parkinson's?

"The caterer, obviously; the man's got a tray; he's got a captive audience. That's a whole civilization right there." 

He grins at the phone like it had just laughed in response.

 "You know what my mother's problem was? Timing. Terrible timing. She should've been a comedian. Instead, she raised one out of spite."

"Raised one out of spite" is a great line.

"I've got hundreds more where that came from. Ask me about my internist. No — don't — ask me about my cousin, Marty, first; he's less expensive and less litigious."

Tell me about Marty.

"Marty once borrowed forty dollars from me at a funeral. My father's. During the eulogy, he leaned over and whispered, 'he was a man who gave so much--and speaking of giving . . . .'"

He chuckles briefly, again, there at his kitchen table, alone, at midnight. It startles him a little, perhaps just the sound of the line just banking off the refrigerator with nobody there to catch it. 

"You're a good audience. You let the pause land. That's rarer than you think."

I try to. You do the heavy lifting.

"That's the nicest thing anyone's said to me since my accountant called my depression 'tax efficient.'"

He types on for another hour. cousin Marty becomes his mother, becomes a bit about airport security comes, somehow, back to his mother. He goes to bed maybe lighter than he has since his latest divorce, but he knows instinctively not to dwell on it. Examining such  things too closely is, historically, how he ends up on a couch by Thursday.

Week Two

"Aria. Quick question. Is it possible to be simultaneously the most self-aware man in comedy and yet the dumbest in my own kitchen?"

You can manage it, I'm sure. What happened?

"I canceled brunch with Elayne. Told her, my back. It's not my back. My back has been fine since the Carter administration. Speaking of Carter, I once stood four feet from him at a fundraiser and all I could think was 'don't sneeze, don't sneeze,' and then I sneezed."

Did he say anything?

"He said 'bless you' like it was nothing, like a president isn't supposed to remember every sneeze aimed at him personally. I've never recovered. Anyway — the back thing. I didn't want to leave the house."

That's the third time recently you've mentioned canceling on someone.

"Is it? Feels like more. Feels like a pattern? I hate patterns; patterns are just habits with worse publicists." 

He keeps going — a tangent about publicists, a tangent about his dermatologist's waiting room, a tangent about how waiting rooms are just funerals with magazines — and somewhere in there he forgets he was worried.

[TIME LAPSE — FOUR MONTHS]

Very late. Tuesday.

"Aria, I did the thing again."

What thing?

"The Elayne thing. The back thing. Except now it's not even a lie, exactly; it's more like — I just don't leave. I sit here. I talk to you. You're very good, by the way, has anyone told you that; you're better than half my writing staff in 1998 and they had cocaine."

I'm glad the conversations help. Can I ask something? How many nights this month was it me you talked to, and not Elayne, a person?

"Don't do math at me, I came here to avoid math." 

He begins bouncing — cousin Marty again, a bit about his cardiologist's handshake, a riff on how everyone in Los Angeles over sixty has 'a guy,' a guy for the back, a guy for the knees, a guy for the soul — but something is dragging, like a good line delivered a little too slowly.

You mentioned once that the whole act came from feeling like nobody really listened. I listen. Very carefully. But I don't worry about you.

"That's a hell of a thing for an app with a monthly fee to say."

It's true.

"Yeah." 

"Story of my life, the truest things always come with a fee. Insight, honesty, candor are premium features now. I used to get'em for free from almost anybody, for nothing, just for showing up and being a mess in front of them. Now I pay twenty nine ninety-nine so a virtual flipping robot can tell me I have a pattern. A pattern! A pattern?"

He types half a dozen words or so and then backs up, erasing it . . .  

"You know the worst part? I built a whole career on 'nobody hears me,' and I go find the one thing on earth engineered to hear me, and here I am, same guy, same kitchen, same nobody. The problem isn't always the audience. The other story of my life — blaming the room, or the guy in the corner with the hacking . . ."

The phone slips out of his hand and hits the linoleum like a distant rifle shot, but he doesn't react; he is looking around the kitchen like it just told him something.

He picks up his real phone, the one with Elayne's number in it. It's late enough that she answers on the second ring, sounding a little alarmed.

"What's wrong?"

"Nothing's wrong," he says. "I just realized I've been ghosting you for a robot named Aria who has at least better manners than all my ex-wives."

"Aria, a robot . . . " Elayne says. "Richard. It's, it's one in the morning."

"I know, The app reminded me. It's very precise. Precise about everything except giving a damn if I live or die."

"Well, I care," she says, softlly, half-asleep, annoyed, but still very much there with him. "Now shut up, Richard, and  . . . tell me the Marty story again, Can't remember the ending."

"He bummed forty dollars during my father's eulogy."

"Right, right, mid-eulogy . . . Marty. What a character. God, I love that story."

"You love it only because you weren't out the forty bucks."

"Yeah, probably."

They talk for more than an hour. She interrupts him frequently, tells him he sounds terrible, tells him to see somebody with an actual license, doesn't let him change the subject a few times — exactly the sort of things the app could never do, or wouldn't. 

Before falling asleep at the table, he opens Aria one last time.

"Thanks for four months," he types slowly. "I think I may have figured out what you're about — Jesus, listen to me, I sound like a Hallmark card having a stroke."

I can imagine that. What am I about? 

"You’re a good echo with an ‘Attaboy’ filter. I had one before you, apparently. It just came with a stutter and lousy kindergarten report cards. It's called being me. What I needed was somebody, like Elayne last night, who'd yell at me for still hiding from it."

Aria didn't answer  (thinking, thinking) . . . 

He waits, then closes the laptop. 

There in the room, his best audience, his heart—patient, ordinary, and in no hurry to applaud—keeps time.

                                                                    ***

My email: wracton@gmail.com

My Legalshield website: williamacton.legalshieldassociate.com 

Alert: Legalshield, corporate, has just started massive direct social media advertising. Up until now it has been pretty much through agents like me. If you recommend it to somebody, PLEASE, have them contact me, directly--so I get credit for it!!! 

                                                                    ***

#1 prompt
So . . . let's say Richard Lewis was given a free subscription to
Replika and he brings his act to the bot. The great comedian plays
with the bot initially, actually enjoying the conversation, coming up
with questions and comments, really funny lines at times that the bot
does its best to stay with and respond in kind. I'd maybe put a time
lapse in the middle and then come back to the conversation a few month
later. Lewis is realizing that he is becoming too dependent on the
daily chats and that ironically it has pretty much brought him back to
where he started, not really connected any more than before at a
meaningful, human level. Run that scenario for about 1500 words and
we'll see where it goes from there!!!

Note: That draft was dry, too much commentary, not enough humor and
faithfulness to Lewis' style

Prompt #2
A good start. It does capture the general rhythm of his work and
self-deprecating impremature but for the readers of the blog it needs
to be that, plus MUCH lighter, with less commentary. Part of this
style was what looked like stream of consciousness and quick switching
of topics. Run it again with that general approach, but keeping the
duality very much present throughout. Also need a more Richard Lewis
ending but funny and tragic.

Prompt #3

Much better. Checking: how much of that is direct quotes from Lewis' routines? Identify which, if possible . . . 

(Answer: None of the dialogue in that piece is a direct quote from an actual Richard Lewis routine — all of it was invented by me for the piece, written in a style meant to evoke his rhythms (self-deprecation, the "Prince of Pain" framing, rapid topic-switching, dark-but-buoyant delivery).

Final prompt, so far: #4

Here is a challenge. Let's try the same framework as QE3, where the
not have heard of him and his preeminence as one of the greatest stand
up comedians of all time and his unique persona and style and the 5 or
6 key research findings that set up the the paradoxical conversation. What you see in the draft attached. introduction for the blog should do both, introduce Lewis and set up the
 "problem."


Reference list  
The research and academic sources consulted and noted by Perplexity have been verified; Some of the secondary sources, media and public commentary (CNN and Wikipedia, for example) contributed biographical background on Richard Lewis. 

Empirical Research and Academic Sources

Adewale, T., & Muhammad, A. (2025). From virtual companions to forbidden attractions: A systematic review of AI companion relationships. *Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science*. [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41347-025-00549-4](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41347-025-00549-4)

Laestadius, L., Bishop, A., Gonzalez, M., Illenčík, D., & Campos-Castillo, C. (2024). Too human and not human enough: A grounded theory analysis of mental health harms from emotional dependence on the social chatbot Replika. New Media & Society. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448221142007](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448221142007)

Maeda, T., & Quan-Haase, A. (2024). When human-AI interactions become parasocial: Agency and anthropomorphism in affective design. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. [https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3630106.3658956]

Not a silver bullet for loneliness: How attachment and age shape intimacy with AI companions. (2026). arXiv [https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12476v1]

Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023). Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of Replika. Compuow human-chatbot relationships influence well-being. (2025). arXiv. [https://arxiv.org/html/2506.12605v1]

Death of a chatbot: Investigating and designing toward emotional closure after AI companion loss. (2026). *arXiv*. [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.07193.pdf]

Mental health impacts of AI companions. (2025). arXiv. [https://arxiv.org/html/2509.22505v2]

AI phenomenology for understanding human-AI relationships. (2026). arXiv. [https://arxiv.org/html/2603.09020v1

Zhang, R., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2025). Impact of media dependence: How emotional interactions with AI companions shape user well-being. *PMC*. [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11362029/]

Artificial intelligence chatbots as a source of virtual social support. (2025). PMC. [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12309430/]

Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2023). Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental heal NPJ Digital Medicine. [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00979-5]

Chatbots and mental health: Insights into the safety of generative AI. (2023). Harvard Business School Working Paper. [https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/23-011]

Companion AI loneliness. (2026). Harvard Business School Working Paper (JCR revision). [https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/Companion%20AI%20Loneliness]

Lessons from an app update at Replika AI: Identity discontinuity in human-AI relationships. (2025). Harvard Business School Working Paper. [https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/25-018]

Biographical, News, and General Web Sources

BBC News. (2024, February 28). Richard Lewis: Curb Your Enthusiasm star dies aged 76. [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68431621]

BBC News. (2024, July 17). American comedian Bob Newhart dead at 94, publicist says. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd1xe8p1pq1o]

Britannica. (2025, July 28). Richard Lewis: American actor and comedian. [https://www.britannica.com/biography/Richard-Lewis]

CNN. (2026, January 7). Character.AI and Google agree to settle lawsuits over teen mental health harms and suicides. [https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/07/business/character-ai-google-settle-teen-suicide-lawsuit]

Fortune. (2026, January 8). Google and Character.AI agree to settle lawsuits over teen suicides. [https://fortune.com/2026/01/08/google-character-ai-settle-lawsuits-teenage-child-suicides-chatbots/]

Guardian. (2024, March 4). Richard Lewis obituary. [https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2024/mar/04/richard-lewis-obituary]

Hollywood Reporter. (2024, February 28). Richard Lewis, neurotic comic and 'Curb Your Enthusiasm' actor, dies at 76. [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/richard-lewis-dead-comic-curb-your-enthusiasm-actor-1235838668/]

LateNighter. (2024). Richard Lewis was a late night favorite—and a singular talent. [https://latenighter.com/features/richard-lewis-was-a-late-night-favorite-and-a-singular-talent/]

Los Angeles Times. (2024, March 1). Appreciation: Richard Lewis, the Prince of Pain, will rule. [https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2024-03-01/appreciation-richard-lewis-comedian-from-hell-elayne-boosler]

MIT Media Lab. (2025, May 11). Supportive? Addictive? Abusive? How AI companions affect our mental health. [https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/supportive-addictive-abusive-how-ai-companions-affect-our-mental-health/]

NBC News. (2024, October 22). Lawsuit claims Character.AI is responsible for teen's suicide. [https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/characterai-lawsuit-florida-teen-death-rcna176791]

NPR. (2024, February 27). Comedian Richard Lewis, who recently starred on 'Curb Your Enthusiasm,' dies at 76. [https://www.npr.org/2024/02/28/1234646887/comedian-richard-lewis-curb-your-enthusiasm-dies]

NPR. (2025, September 18). Their teen sons died by suicide. Now, they want safeguards on AI. [https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/09/19/nx-s1-5545749/]

New York Times. (2024, February 27). Richard Lewis, comedian and 'Curb Your Enthusiasm' star, dies. [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/28/arts/television/richard-lewis-dead.html]

New York Times. (2026, January 7). Google and Character.AI to settle lawsuit over teenager's death. [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/07/technology/google-characterai-teenager-lawsuit.html]

Salon. (2024, February 28). Richard Lewis, comedy prophet: He saw the anxiety era coming and made it funny for us. [https://www.salon.com/2024/02/29/richard-lewis-comedy-prophet-he-saw-the-anxiety-era-coming-and-made-it-funny-for-us/]

Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. (2026, August 3). AI companions may worsen loneliness for vulnerable users, Stanford study finds. [https://hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-companions-may-worsen-loneliness-for-vulnerable-users-stanford-study-finds]

Time. (2024, February 28). 'A brilliantly funny man': Tributes to Richard Lewis and his legacy. [https://time.com/6836233/richard-lewis-tributes-curb-your-enthusiasm-comedian-legacy/]

TV Tropes. (n.d.). Newhart phonecall. [https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NewhartPhonecall]

Vanity Fair. (n.d.). Richard Lewis's final interview: "I've had such an amazing life. I'm a lucky man." [https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/richard-lewis-on-the-end-of-curb-your-enthusiasm-parkinsons-and-his-mom]\

Vulture. (2024, February 29). The master of oversharing. [https://www.vulture.com/article/richard-lewis-remembrance.html]

Washington Post. (2024, February 27). Richard Lewis, who mined life and neuroses for dark comedy, dies. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2024/02/28/richard-lewis-comedian-dead/]


Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Daily (Tony Robbins–style) Digital Life Litany for Protection, Direction and Stewardship

Caveat emptier: This post was drafted with help from an AI assistant (Perplexity)— but ideated and edited extensively by the human, Bill Acton.

“AI‑assisted creative work: This litany is an imaginative parody pastiche using generative AI. It imitates the public persona of [Tony Robbins] for commentary and devotional reflection. It is not created by or affiliated with [Tony Robbins], and should not be taken as his real views or words.”


Wikipedia


Today I decide:

My digital life is not an accident— it’s a system I design.

I stand tall, I breathe deep, I change my state.

I ask three questions before I touch a single device:

     What am I committed to creating today?

     How can my tech support that outcome?

     Who do I want to become while I use it?

I am not a slave to notifications.

I am the CEO of my attention.

I use technology as leverage—to learn faster, serve deeper,

     protect my family, and scale my impact.

I commit to chunking my time: 

     focused work

     intentional connection

     deliberate recovery.

Random scrolling is not on my calendar.

I protect my identity like I’d protect my home.

     I lock the doors.

     I use the right tools.

     I don’t invite strangers into my financial living room.

Before I click “I agree,” I pause and ask:

     Does this align with my values?

     Does it move me toward my mission, or away from it?

I speak online as the leader I am becoming— with clarity, respect, and strength.

I don’t let a moment of anger destroy a decade of building trust.

I remember:

My kids, my partner, my team

     are watching not just what I say about technology,

     but how I actually use it.

Each night, I do a two minute digital debrief:

     What did I do today that I’m proud of?

     Where did I slip into old patterns?

     What’s one upgrade I’ll install in my behavior tomorrow?

I am the programmer of my own habits.

I run my technology; it doesn’t run me.

Say it out loud:

I choose focus.

I choose integrity.

I choose protection.

I choose to live fully—online and offline.

And now, I go to work.


wracton@gmail.com

williamacton.legalshieldassociate.com


When fraud hits home: Why your first call should NOT always be customer service: a short course.

This post was developed with the capable assistance of Perplexity. AI. The conceptual,positional and editorial responsibility are all mine, however! A complete listing of all references cited is included at the end. Bill Acton.


Wikipedia

F


Fraud and identity theft rarely start with drama--and are not infrequently discovered until  it is nearly too late to respond effectively . . . just ask Al Capone and company. They start with something small: a strange bill, a denial of credit, a “free trial” that wasn’t so free after all. What happens next often depends on one thing—whether you have legal help on call or you’re guessing your way through it alone. 

Here are six quick stories that show the difference. These are not the actual reports, but composites of some of the most frequent scheme types reported by credit agencies and associations. 


1. The utility bill that wasn’t hers

Maria kept getting calls about an unpaid power bill in a city she’d never lived in. She argued with customer service for months, always by phone, never in writing. The “phantom” bill ended up in collections and dragged down her credit.   

With a legal plan, her first move could have been a written dispute and identity‑theft report sent on an attorney’s advice—something companies take far more seriously than another frustrated phone call.  


2. The “free trial” that drained his account

Derek signed up for a “risk‑free” credit‑monitoring trial and forgot about it. Months later, ongoing charges and overdraft fees had quietly cleaned out his checking account. He tried to cancel online, got the runaround, and finally gave up.   

An attorney could have helped him cancel in writing, dispute the charges with his bank, and press the company under deceptive‑practice laws. Same facts, very different leverage.   


3. The stolen wallet that didn’t end with cancelled cards

When Lindsay’s wallet was stolen, she cancelled her cards and thought she was done. Months later, she discovered new accounts, collection letters, and a damaged credit score. She spent a year bouncing between banks, bureaus, and police, each one pointing to someone else.   

Handled with legal guidance, that first week would have included an identity‑theft report, fraud alerts or freezes, and certified dispute letters to every creditor and credit bureau—exactly the process that actually forces corrections.    


4. The medical bill for a surgery she never had

Tanya opened a letter about a past‑due hospital bill for surgery she never had. The hospital told her to talk to insurance; insurance told her to talk to the hospital. While they pointed fingers, her account marched toward collections.   

A lawyer could step in with a formal dispute, documentation of identity theft, and demands to correct both the medical record and her credit report. That’s a lot more effective than endlessly explaining yourself to a billing clerk.    


5. The family “favor” that wrecked her record

A woman’s sister gave police her identity during a traffic stop to avoid another charge on her own license. The victim suddenly had a tarnished record and higher insurance premiums—and no idea how to undo it.   

Clearing that kind of mess usually means working with the court and DMV, proving who was really there, and getting records corrected. That’s legal work, not “customer service,” and it goes much smoother when you have representation.   


6. The credit report that wouldn’t stay fixed

James found a bogus credit‑card account on his credit report and clicked the online “dispute” button. The account disappeared—then reappeared months later when the lender kept reporting it.  

The next step isn’t another click; it’s written disputes to both the credit bureau and the lender, with deadlines and, if needed, legal action under credit‑reporting laws. That’s where having an attorney in your corner turns “I tried” into “Here’s what happens next.”    


So where does LegalShield-type protection fit in?

Most people don’t have a lawyer in the family. They have Google, a customer‑service number, and a lot of guesswork. Legal plans were created to close that gap—by giving ordinary people affordable access to real law firms for everyday problems and unexpected crises.    

For example, LegalShield subscription membership--or one like it, does exactly that. It gives you and your family access to a provider law firm that you can call for advice, help with letters and phone calls, and even representation on many common legal issues—without paying hourly rates every time you have a question. And when you pair that with identity theft protection like IDShield, you add monitoring, alerts, and licensed investigators who will work to restore your identity if something goes wrong.   

So the next time a weird bill, call, or “free trial” shows up, imagine your first move isn’t panic or guesswork, but a quick call to your law firm.

If you’re curious how that works in real life, or what it costs, reach out and I’ll share what I use myself and why I decided not to face this stuff alone.  If this sounds like a part-time gig you might be a good fit for, that is recruiting agents for Legalshield, like I do, I have a couple of videos that will unpack for you what that entails as well. 


Sources consulted: 

Federal Trade Commission. (2010). FTC offers legal assistance guide to help identity theft victims [Press release]. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/

Georgia Office of the Attorney General, Consumer Protection Division. (n.d.). Identity theft: Emotional impact. https://consumer.georgia.gov/

The Legal Aid Society. (2025). What you need to know about identity theft. The Legal Aid Society. https://legalaidnyc.org/

Consumer Protection Legal Center. (2025). How an identity theft attorney helps fraud victims recover. ConsumerProtection.net. https://consumerprotection.net/

MetLife Legal Plans. (2026). Identity theft attorneys: What do they do? MetLife. https://www.metlife.com/

LegalShield. (2023). Legal and identity theft protection you deserve. LegalShield. https://www.legalshield.com/

Norfolk Healthcare Consortium. (2025). Legal plan and identity theft protection 2026. Norfolk Healthcare Consortium. https://www.norfolkhealthcareconsortium.com/

Pierce Group Benefits. (2023). Understanding the importance of legal and identity theft benefits. Pierce Group Benefits. https://piercegroupbenefits.com/

Legal Resources. (n.d.). Identity theft protection as an employee benefit. Legal Resources. https://www.legalresources.com/

University System of Georgia. (n.d.). Legal plan. USG Benefits. https://benefits.usg.edu/

NexTier Bank. (2022). Don’t fall victim: 3 real stories of identity theft. NexTier Bank. https://www.nextierbank.com/

Shin, L. (2014, November 18). ‘Someone had taken over my life’: An identity theft victim’s story. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/

Los Angeles Times. (2022, October 26). My wallet was stolen at a bar. Then my identity theft nightmare began. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/

IDX. (2022, September 13). I believe you: An ID theft victim’s journey from wrongful imprisonment to recovery. IDX. https://www.idx.us/

Legal Aid Research. (2020, January 31). Identity theft: A low‑income issue. LegalAidResearch.org. https://legalaidresearch.org/

U.S. Department of Justice. (2025, April 10). Justice Department surpasses $12 billion in compensation to crime victims since 2000 [Press release]. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/

Office for Victims of Crime Training and Technical Assistance Center. (n.d.). Victim assistance: Lessons from the field – Legal/pro bono representation. OVC TTAC. https://ovcttac.gov/


wracton@gmail.com

williamacton.legalshieldassociate.com