One who hesitates is NOT lost (when repeating new words to remember them better by)

                                                   

(Credit: Clker.com)

Actually, the study (Summarized by Neurosciencenews.com) Repeating New Words Out Loud Isn’t Always the Best Way to Learn Them, by Kapnoula et al. Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL) is, more or less, a neuroscientific validation of a principle established decades (and decades ago) by experienced language teachers: sometimes pausing for a instant before you repeat the new word (or piles of words) is the better way to learn and remember it. 

The research does, however, point indirectly to an important development in the field in the last few decades: learning new words out of context, even if the meaning is provided in some form, is a very delicate and complex process, best case. Simply put, subjects in one condition either (a) repeated a new  English-looking, nonsense word (e.g., penivasher) immediately or (b) paused slightly and then repeated the word out loud. With a 4-second pause, their memory for the latter words the next day was significantly better than the former. From the study:

“When a person repeats a word immediately after hearing it, cognitive resources are dedicated to preparing the production of the word and, as a result, these resources cannot be used to deeply encode that word. In contrast, if production is delayed for a few seconds, this overlap is avoided, allowing deeper learning and encoding to take place.”

Ok. That makes sense. But then we have this: 

“Understanding these cognitive mechanisms can teach us how to use repetition more efficiently in educational contexts. For example, teachers can encourage students to repeat a new word the first time they hear it, but after this first exposure, the learning processes should focus more on listening rather than on production,” 

What? Why do I suspect that the researchers have never taught or been taught language--or if they have, poorly, at that?

 " . . . repeat it (once) but after this first exposure, the learning process should focus on listening rather than production . . .?" 

Imagine in just what teaching system/context would that apply. Granted, if all you are working with are new words IN ISOLATION (without associated meaning), where the goal is just reading or listening comprehension for some reason--maybe passing an L2 reading test, not speaking, that figures. But if the new words are actual L2 words, encountered in a rich, memorable context and high frequency collocation--the general M.O. of contemporary language methodology--then radically switching away from productive, out loud repetition/use of words in learning is  . . . well . . . arcane, to put it mildly. 

This may be a case where researchers take what is actually a very nice study and pretty much fanta-(or over)-size its potential application, or don't spend enough time on the concluding paragraph. (I'd pause a bit before assuming it is but the latter . . . )

Now if you do want to experience full-body, memorable engagement/repetition of new words--without hesitation--go to: www.actonhaptic/kinetik 

Keep in touch.

Bill

Source: Wait long and prosper! Delaying production alleviates its detrimental effect on word learning. Kapnoula, C. & Sameul, A. 2023 Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2144917

Free, half of the new 10-week KINETIK Fluency and Pronunciation Course!

Join us beginning February 15th for the course. (The PROMO poster is posted below.) Works like this:

• Every Wednesday morning I'll post the link to the recorded lesson here on the blog.
• This is part of a course being offered on Zoom by the MATESOL at Trinity Western University.
• Each video is approximately 35 minutes in length. 
• Included is 
• Training on one technique for teaching/learning a key pronunciation sound or process (Most of the time it involves standing up, moving along with me as your body learns the gestural patterns involved.)
• Homework assignment (about 30-minuts per day recommended)
• Links to (free) practice on the web

• The other half of the course, which includes all materials and a weekly, live feedback and Q&A session on Zoom, is restricted access to those who subscribe for the course ($500 CAD). If you'd like the full deal: william.acton@twu.ca.

KINETIK and Haptic Pronunciation Teaching at TESOL 2023 in Portland!

Haptic Pronunciation Teaching at the upcoming TESOL 2023 Convention in Portland, March 21~24th!

Doing two presentations:

• A pre-convention Institute with Angelina VanDyke. Tuesday afternoon, 1-5, Talking (and analyzing) Pragmatics with Students: Meta-pragmatics and Embodied Prosody. (That is an extra, paid event, $150USD-- well worth the price of admission, of course!) 
• A workshop with Eileen McWilliams, "Prosodic Pas de deux: Teaching Conversational Discourse Orientation," Thursday, 23 March, 15:00-16:45 (At least one of the cleverest session titles ever!) 

I'll be there promoting the amazing KINETIK Method (www.actonhaptic.com/kinetik/) Always open for a breakfast, lunch, dinner or later with hapticians and other lovers of "haptic." I plan to be in the networking area next to the publishers' booths, both mid-morning and mid-afternoon for an hour or so.

Have decided to self-publish an eBook based on the KINETIK Method, working title: Bill Acton's Haptic Global English Pronunciation Program. Will have excerpts available by then which I'll have with me and will be linking here on the blog and on the website. 

If you are a runner, join us each morning for 6-8km "haptic jog" around 6!

Email at: wracton@gmail.com for more info.

See you there! 

Getting in the right mood for enhancing your work (and even pronunciation!)

You "up" for a little meta-theory? 

Fascinating study, open source, published in Frontiers in Communication by Lai, Berkum and Hagoort: Negative affect increases reanalysis of conflicts between discourse context and world knowledge. Here is the researchers' conclusion: 

"These results suggest that mood does not influence all processes involved in discourse processing. Specifically, mood does not influence lexical-semantic retrieval (N400), but it does influence elaborative processes for sense making (P600) during discourse processing."

Not quite sure how to feel about this fascinating research at this moment . . . but it should interesting from some perspective, regardless of your general mood or affect as you read about it. In essence, what the research establishes, not surprisingly, is that if you are in a rotten mood at the moment you might be better at deconstructing what follows, identifying the fudging, etc. (As it turns out, the fact that I had just gotten back from a great run on my first read of the research report may have been "colored" by all those endorphins!)

The complete structure of the study is a bit complex to unpack (but you can here, however, or check out the Neuroscience.com summary). Basically, subjects attempted to identify different features of a narrative/story working within two conditions, one more emotionally "negative;" the other, considerably less so. In effect, mood did not appear to impact their ability to focus in on details but it did influence their success at arriving at an integrated understanding or interpretation of the overall narrative or discourse. 

Does that make sense? Of course . . .  So does the application of that work to pronunciation teaching! (Actually, it almost explains a number of things and people in this field, but I'll stick to pronunciation teaching!) 

There are number of pairs of binary (or false) conceptual distinctions that are of more or less utility to us as we sit down to work on a problem as heuristics or mnemonics at best where mood (in several senses) may figure in prominently, whether the mind set of the analyst at the moment or the degree to which mood (affect/emotion et al) is subsumed in  concepts involving attention to or focus on: 

• digital vs analogical 
• accuracy vs fluency
• segmentals vs supra-segmentals
• structure vs meaning or function
• sentence-level vs discourse-level context
• experiential vs cognitive/pre-frontal engagement
• affect vs metacognitive 
• particle vs wave/field analysis
• individual vs group engagement and learning
• local vs global constructs
• visual vs auditory
• learner autonomy vs learner indoctrination 
• critical vs inquiry-based thought
• conscious vs unconscious processing
• left vs right hemisphere-like processing

And how do or should those relate to (KINETIK) pronunciation teaching and learning? Not much, if at all. What contemporary neuroscience reveals very convincingly is that overemphasis on any of those earlier, simple binary distinctions, many of them but remnants or artifacts of earlier "science,"  especially in combination, can be fatal.

Ideas don't die . . . but people (and students) do. 

Bill

Citation: Lai VT, van Berkum J and Hagoort P (2022) Negative affect increases reanalysis of conflicts between discourse context and world knowledge. Front. Commun. 7:910482. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.910482